STR dating of Y-chromsome haplogroups

Welcome to Quetzalcoatl: anthropology forum. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

STR dating of Y-chromsome haplogroups
Topic Started: Nov 6 2008, 06:03 AM (139 Views)
Ibra	Nov 6 2008, 06:03 AM Post #1
Global Mod Posts: 724 Group: Global Mod Member #33 Joined: May 23, 2005	admin note: Topic split from http://s6.zetaboards.com/man/topic/528048 black man Nov 1 2008, 01:53 AM Shi Hong et al. wrote about data from more East and High Asian individuals. Apparently, markers for hgs D2 and D3 were tested, too. But the STR markers remained the same as last time. Dienekes criticised their age estimates. Actually forget what I said an evolutionary rate closer to the germline rate better explains the variation in Native American Q1a1a. I recommend the evolutionary rate of 2.7810^-3 for a set of 25 markers proposed by Chandler. http://www.jogg.info/22/Chandler.pdf And a generation length of 31.5. Edited by Ibra*, Nov 15 2008, 02:09 AM.



ren	Oct 28 2009, 02:11 AM Post #2
Yoda Posts: 2,711 Group: Custodian Member #1 Joined: January 2, 2005	Paper in JOGG about realistic TMRCA calculations. If anyone has time, is it any different from what Dienekes said? http://www.jogg.info/42/files/nordtvedt.pdf
	It has already begun.


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Population Genetics · Next Topic »