THE PLOT FOR ZELDA WII

Welcome to Hyrule Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.

Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

THE PLOT FOR ZELDA WII; Possible Spoilers
Topic Started: Jul 25 2009, 12:43 AM (67 Views)
Joseppi	Jul 25 2009, 12:43 AM Post #1
Who? Posts: 718 Group: Members Member #176 Joined: February 6, 2007 Gender Guy Favorite Game Ocarina of Time Native Country USA	If you guys haven't heard, there is a new Zelda coming out for the Wii. Nintendo hasn't said much about it but they did release a picture. Many Zelda fans including myself believe that the main plot is centered around the Master Sword. If you look at the picture, you will notice that Link isn't holding a sword. And look closely at the girl in the picture. She IS the Master Sword! Here is a diagram that shows the similarities between the girl and the Master Sword. Here's a video explaining in more detail what I'm saying in this post. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwL6cWvMbLI Edited by Joseppi, Jul 27 2009, 12:51 AM.
	Hey Stalkers! You can find me at: MySpace \| Facebook \| YouTube \| Twitter \| deviantART


Panther III	Jul 30 2009, 07:10 PM Post #2
Meow! Posts: 4,103 Group: Administrator Member #1 Joined: August 3, 2006	Perhaps it is a sequal to Majora... oh wait. Miyamoto wouldn't give us something we want. It probably has submarines or something instead.
	LollyWolly ah i hate new york drivers... you cant even begin to understand... i mean ive tried driving in new york city to see if they drove better on their own turf.. doesnt happen... just more assholes compiled together Naoko [Gilmer's Spelling is so bad, he] probably thinks the "Holocaust" is a type of holographic pokemon card. Remember... Capitalization is the difference between "I had to help my uncle Jack off a horse.." and "I had to help my uncle jack off a horse.."


Joseppi	Jul 30 2009, 11:35 PM Post #3
Who? Posts: 718 Group: Members Member #176 Joined: February 6, 2007 Gender Guy Favorite Game Ocarina of Time Native Country USA	I don't mind the train idea in Spirit Tracks. The Zelda games take place centuries apart from each other but societies of Hyrule have very little technological advancements from one game to the other. A railroad system is a long leap and I welcome it. Spirit Tracks could be the latest game in the timeline. But I'm getting off topic here. Nintendo needs to make more games to fill in the gaps in the middle. Miyamoto won't give me what I want until he explains the Zelda timeline.
	Hey Stalkers! You can find me at: MySpace \| Facebook \| YouTube \| Twitter \| deviantART


Fullmetal	Jul 31 2009, 09:35 AM Post #4
Perma-bored Posts: 1,882 Group: Admin Member #43 Joined: August 20, 2006 Gender Guy Native Country Canada	Quote: Nintendo needs to make more games to fill in the gaps in the middle. Miyamoto won't give me what I want until he explains the Zelda timeline. At first Miyamoto said there was a timeline (when there were like 4-5 games), then a bunch of youtube videos about different timelines were made, and as a reply Nintendo of America said there was no such thing as a Zelda timeline. This is getting pretty fucked up. So either : A) There was a timeline and in the end they decided to forget about it since there's too many games and they barely link with each other. B) There was and still is a timeline, and Nintendo of America is lying /doesn't know shit about Zelda. C) There never was a timeline, Miyamoto just didn't want to disappoint the fans by saying there was none/was caught by surprise by the interviewer and didn't know what to say.



Joseppi	Jul 31 2009, 03:54 PM Post #5
Who? Posts: 718 Group: Members Member #176 Joined: February 6, 2007 Gender Guy Favorite Game Ocarina of Time Native Country USA	Fullmetal Jul 31 2009, 09:35 AM So either : A) There was a timeline and in the end they decided to forget about it since there's too many games and they barely link with each other. B) There was and still is a timeline, and Nintendo of America is lying /doesn't know shit about Zelda. C) There never was a timeline, Miyamoto just didn't want to disappoint the fans by saying there was none/was caught by surprise by the interviewer and didn't know what to say. I'm going with C. Nintendo have very lazy story writers. It wouldn't be hard at all to give Zelda a timeline. All they have to do is make each new game explain a little bit more. One of the reasons I play Zelda games is to see if the newest game explains more about the timeline. That was the best part about Wind Waker IMO. Twilight Princess made things a little more confusing though. The Temple of Time being in ruins was a nice addition but it messed the timeline up by being located in a whole different part of Hyrule. My answer for that is: A)The Temple of Time was moved. B) Hyrule rebuilt up north. C) It's n ot the same Temple of Time that was in OoT. (I only say this because it looks a little different inside.) D) Nintendo doesn't care about consistency. I like to think that Hyrule just moved up north. Because a lot of other things are different too. But the obvious choice is probably D, unfortunately.
	Hey Stalkers! You can find me at: MySpace \| Facebook \| YouTube \| Twitter \| deviantART


Game Freak	Aug 22 2009, 07:53 PM Post #6
King of Games Posts: 4,669 Group: Tech Admin Member #11 Joined: August 4, 2006 Gender N/A Favorite Game Donkey Kong Country 2, Ocarina of Time Native Country Hyrule	Joseppi Jul 31 2009, 03:54 PM I'm going with C. Nintendo have very lazy story writers. It wouldn't be hard at all to give Zelda a timeline. All they have to do is make each new game explain a little bit more. One of the reasons I play Zelda games is to see if the newest game explains more about the timeline. That was the best part about Wind Waker IMO. Twilight Princess made things a little more confusing though. The Temple of Time being in ruins was a nice addition but it messed the timeline up by being located in a whole different part of Hyrule. My answer for that is: A)The Temple of Time was moved. B) Hyrule rebuilt up north. C) It's n ot the same Temple of Time that was in OoT. (I only say this because it looks a little different inside.) D) Nintendo doesn't care about consistency. I like to think that Hyrule just moved up north. Because a lot of other things are different too. But the obvious choice is probably D, unfortunately. could Twilight Princess be the sequel to Adventure of Link, then? Hmmm...perhaps that is where it fits on the GameTrailers retrospective timeline....Spirit Tracks may be an obvious successor to PH, which is a successor to WW, so that's all fine and dandy, and if TP goes after AoL and before the Seasons games, then we're all good! Also, don't forget that the girl's cloak is the master sword's hilt upside down Edited by Game Freak, Aug 22 2009, 07:54 PM.
	Completed: - ~~Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time~~ (2005) - ~~Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker~~ (2006) - ~~Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess~~ (Dec. '06) - ~~Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening~~ (7/24/07) - ~~Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages~~ (8/09/07) - ~~Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons with Final Ending~~ (8/22/07) - ~~Legend of Zelda: The Minish Cap~~ (4/05/08) - ~~Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past~~ (4/09/08) - ~~Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass~~ (4/12/08) - ~~Legend of Zelda: Four Swords Adventures~~ (4/21/08) - ~~The Legend of Zelda~~ (4/23/08) - ~~Majora's Mask~~ (2/20/09) Currently Playing: - Zelda II: Adventure of Link


1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · Nintendo · Next Topic »