| Viewing Single Post From: My Thoughts On The Zelda Series | |
|---|---|
| fhqwhgads | Sep 1 2007, 07:02 PM |
|
Peahat
|
Few things. Yes, I did diss TP. It wasn't good enough. It was just OoT, except worse. Orchestration, they've said that's the only thing that's stopping them, so obviously, they can't do it. Voice acting. If Metroid can pull it off that well, Zelda can do it easily. There's bigger things they need to worry about first. DId I say they revolutionized Zelda? Hmm, wrong choice of words, I guess. They uh, changed it. Did something different. Kept the working core, changed the repetitive outer shell. Zelda II, it was bad. Being old doesn't matter. Look at Super Mario Bros. Did that define platformers? Uh, yeah. Is it considered one of the best games ever? Yeah, again. Is it old? Yup. You're way overexaggerating the sea. Besides, they fixed it in PH. They made it more exciting and smaller. So, that's pretty much over. No voice chat and crappy online...so? Should a game be remembered from its online? No. Halo 3 is being said that it's going to be the best multiplayer experience. So what? I want the actual game to be good. Metroid. Bad multiplayer, amazing singleplayer. And they're amazing games. Voice chat? Big deal again. Do you really need it? "Lol, I fragged you!" Worth it. Sure, you can discuss strategy and all, so what do you know?They'll do it for the games that need it. Once again, overexaggerating. Hunters had Voice Chat, D/P did too. Biggest two. And uh, D/P has what, six million units sold? That's real small. Replacing hardcore games? What exactly was the reason H.A.M.M.E.R. was canceled again? Bad minigames? I agree with that, but most aren't even from Nintendo. Zelda really doesn't need core change, it just sorta needs to be brought into the present. |
 You will be referred! | |
 |
|
| My Thoughts On The Zelda Series · Nintendo | |
