| a zelda rpg?; like paper mario or mario and luigi | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 27 2008, 10:07 AM (214 Views) | |
| NintendoFan | Jan 27 2008, 10:07 AM Post #1 |
|
a zelda rpg? like when you run into an enemy you have to fight it with different attacks,items and stratigies |
![]() "Lemon juice isn't made from lemons, but dishliquid is." | |
![]() |
|
TriforceMan
|
Jan 27 2008, 11:23 AM Post #2 |
|
Triumphant Return!
|
No thanks. I'd rather have Zelda remain an action/adventure. The real time fighting is a valuable part of the Zelda series. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Tenth_Dimenstion | Jan 28 2008, 08:00 PM Post #3 |
|
ZELDA II was a little rpg-ish the game itself, i hated |
![]() |
|
| eomund | Jan 29 2008, 12:12 PM Post #4 |
|
WHY THE HELL DOES EVERY ONE SAY THEY HATE THAT GAME?! /rant No Zelda II was not in the slightets rpg ish. It did the side scroller, but it was all real time fighting. The closest you can even compare it to is the random encounter system when your walking on the map. I'll admit the game wasn't perfect, but it was still a good game. And to the original topic, I 100% agree with TriforceMan. The real time fighting makes the adventures fast paced and fun. I would hat to see it get all Dungeons and Dragons on us. |
![]() |
|
TriforceMan
|
Jan 29 2008, 05:17 PM Post #5 |
|
Triumphant Return!
|
Because it's so radically different from the other games. It's a change people didn't like. I've never actually played the game, so I have no actual say, although I don't doubt that many people here who have commented on it haven't played it either. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |












