| Welcome to Zap Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Post your .INI tweaks!; how do YOU like your bitfighter? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 7 2009, 06:26 PM (99 Views) | |
| karamazovapy | Nov 7 2009, 06:26 PM Post #1 |
street cred
|
StarsInDistance=No SFXSet=Classic ControlMode=Absolute LoadoutIndicators=No VerboseHelpMessages=No ShowKeyboardKeysInStickMode=No DefaultName=_k EnableExperimentalAimMode=No BurstGraphics=1 SZGraphics=2 What about you? |
 |
 
|
| sky_lark | Nov 10 2009, 12:45 AM Post #2 |
Will Live 4 Bitfighter!
|
I haven't really messed with it but I might turn off the stars setting and customize the quick chat items.
Edited by sky_lark, Nov 10 2009, 09:59 PM.
|
|
|
| watusimoto | Nov 10 2009, 12:36 PM Post #3 |
|
Zapper Extreme
|
I use the stock INI options (but then they've been customized for my tastes :-) When my kids play, we use the command line settings to override the defaults, and open two windows side-by-side on a single machine. Does anyone play with relative controls? |
|
|
|
| sky_lark | Nov 10 2009, 02:36 PM Post #4 |
|
Will Live 4 Bitfighter!
|
I prefer relative controls for showing off and navigating through tight spaces but not as a practical measure. Window or full-screen? |
|
|
|
| ShadowX.loner | Nov 10 2009, 02:45 PM Post #5 |
You're Nothing Special Chump
|
I use to play with relative controls for almost a year. They're a bit tricky, especially when using any other directions besides forward. I use Fullscreen. |
|
|
|
| karamazovapy | Nov 12 2009, 10:17 PM Post #6 |
|
street cred
|
Has the SZGraphics option been disabled? I seem to only be able to see SZGraphics=1 anymore. |
|
|
|
| watusimoto | Nov 13 2009, 02:51 AM Post #7 |
|
Zapper Extreme
|
I think it was, semi-inadvertently. The main reason was because the "collision polygon" did not match the graphic, so I had to make a decision. |
|
|
|
| karamazovapy | Nov 13 2009, 03:39 AM Post #8 |
|
street cred
|
too bad...I liked the classic white arrow much more than the double red. |
|
|
|
| watusimoto | Nov 13 2009, 04:26 AM Post #9 |
|
Zapper Extreme
|
Well... I don't. However I suppose I could reinstate the option, and let you suffer the consequences of having a slightly different hit polygon for the gofast. Wouldn't really bother me what you do in the privacy of your own home! :-) |
|
|
|
| karamazovapy | Nov 13 2009, 12:38 PM Post #10 |
|
street cred
|
My biggest problem with it is that it adds bright red to every map that has a gofast. It's visually distracting makes for a less attractive color palette. Also, it's a common team color and the new arrows are small, triangular, and about the size of a ship. I'm more against the color than anything. White is much less obtrusive and jives with the neutrality of uncharged turrets and force field projectors. Edited by karamazovapy, Nov 13 2009, 12:39 PM.
|
|
|
|
| sky_lark | Nov 13 2009, 01:41 PM Post #11 |
|
Will Live 4 Bitfighter!
|
I agree. I think the color should be changed. The design is okay in my opinion.
Edited by sky_lark, Nov 13 2009, 01:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
| watusimoto | Nov 13 2009, 02:46 PM Post #12 |
|
Zapper Extreme
|
I think gray/white would be too dull for an item of great action. Perhaps a light blue? And while I like the new design much better than the old, I only like it 80%, and would entertain new designs altogether. |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Bitfighter · Next Topic » |
