Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to The United Nations Old Guard. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
View From An Old Tory
Topic Started: Jul 6 2005, 04:16 PM (47 Views)
Ecopoeia
Member Avatar
E-u-o-c-o-u-p-i-e-i-a-u-o-e-a
Grumpy Old Men
For a bit of a change, here's an article from a conservative, former UK PM, John Major:

The Grauniad, again

I did care, but I didn't do enough

G8 has often fallen short, but this year it has a chance to surprise us

John Major
Wednesday July 6, 2005
The Guardian


It is what one does not do in life that one regrets. I know about dire poverty. I saw it in Nigeria, as a young man, during the Biafran war. And yet, looking back, I know I did far too little to end it.

I did write off debt, both as chancellor and as prime minister. I did - year after year - protect the aid budget against the ravages of more popular claims. I did care about it, but I did not do nearly enough to end it.

There are excuses: the recession I inherited; the slender majority in parliament; the squabbles over Europe; the internecine warfare that distracted my attention; the fact that the issue was lower profile then. I can cite all these reasons for inaction, but none of them convinces my conscience. I should have done more. The leaders of the G8 nations now have the opportunity to put right what so many governments, in so many countries, over so many years, failed to do adequately.

In some parts of the world, corruption and poverty condemn untold millions to a life of misery and hardship. Some may say: "Well, that's their problem. Bad government, bad economic decisions, bad judgments created this." Well, maybe, but their problem? Half the world's population is under 24: in no way can they be held responsible for the conditions in which they live. And, in any event, the world as a whole is having to live with the resentment, bitterness and political hostility that poverty breeds.

Our world has six billion souls. Of these six billion, one half lives on less than $2 per day, and one fifth on less than $1 per day. I daresay few westerners would hesitate in spending several times that sum on a cup of coffee at Starbucks. It is hard to imagine the disparity of the life of the truly poor with someone on the lowest levels of social support in the developed nations.

The rich nations do much to help - but not enough: far more is needed. Collectively, they spend $50bn on overseas aid - an enormous sum: but less generous than it seems when you realise that Europe and America spend $350bn on agricultural subsidies alone.

This policy is even more unpalatable because such subsidies cut away the possibility of poor nations selling their agricultural produce into developed markets. Surely we should recognise that our own long-term self-interest should combine with common humanity to acknowledge that if we are right to wage war on terror - and we are - then it is right to wage war on poverty and hardship as well. This is wise policy in a world fuelled, too often, by hatred.

Moreover, if we do nothing the problem will worsen. In the next 25 years, world population will grow from 6 billion to 8 billion. Of the additional 2 billion, 97% will be in that part of the world that has an income below $2 per day. This is not sustainable if we wish our children to inherit a world free of conflict. Nor is it moral.

Action will come, for it cannot be ignored. The question is when? Too late, and much unnecessary death and suffering will have been endured. Too late, and there will be little political gain for grudging and delayed humanity. But if we act early, act out of conscience, we can foreclose on misery and hardship to come.

There is an argument advanced that Africa will squander any extra aid money; despotic governments will steal it and it will never reach those for whom it is intended. This is a counsel of despair that does not convince.

Help need not be in cash but can be in kind: in irrigation schemes, in farming implements, in medical care, in education, in food, in practical assistance to build the self-sustaining future the poor have never known. To deny this help because of past misdeeds is an unsustainable argument: it was not the hungry, the sick and the dying who squandered past aid, and they should not be punished for it.

Nor should the argument prevail that trade is the only way forward. Trade and investment is vital - of course it is. So is corporate responsibility. The multinationals in particular could do far more, and should. But these should not be cited as an alternative to what is politically wise and morally correct for governments to do.

The G8 has often fallen short of what it could achieve. It meets; it pronounces - and too little changes. This year, under the chairmanship of the UK, it has a marvellous opportunity to surprise us all. The cause is good, the need is great, and action is imperative.

If the G8 raises its game, the leaders of the industrial world can show that the free market actually has a heart at its core: this can be a summit that brings hope to millions who have nothing - and life to millions who otherwise will lose it.

· John Major was prime minister from 1990 to 1997.
Enough is as good as a feast

To Ill-Advisedly Go!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Knootoss
Member Avatar
Klingon-hater
Members
*applause*

You know... I noticed some other Conservative poltiticians who developed a heart AFTER their tenure.

Over here we have Dries van Acht, the Former Dutch PM of the right-wing Christian Democratic Party who - amongst others - pleaded for an Iraq pull-out and criticised the current governments welfare reform. He also spoke out for the plight of the Palestinion people repeatedly.

I found the old article:
Quote:
 
Former Dutch PM wants Iraq pull-out
Monday 26 April 2004, 14:04

Former Dutch prime minister Dries van Agt has said the government should bring back troops from Iraq as soon as possible. Speaking on the Nova TV news channel on Monday, the ex-PM stressed withdrawal was the only moral option.

Agt said the Netherlands should withdraw because it was participating without any UN mandate in an illegal occupation. The politician also said the US and Israel "repeatedly and seriously" breached international law and called the US "a rogue state"

Describing Bush's support for Israel as ''irresponsible and unjust'', the politician said the Dutch government and parliament would have to decide whether the troops would remain in Iraq or not

Occupation axis member

Officially one of the US-British allies, the Netherlands currently deploys about 1300 troops to maintain security in a sparsely populated desert province in the south of Iraq since the summer of 2003

They have patrolled a relatively peaceful area of Iraq, but with rising violence elsewhere, the province of al-Muthanna is also turning for the worse. On Sunday, Dutch troops shot and killed an Iraqi after his car failed to stop at a checkpoint The Dutch base in al-Samawa was also attacked with mortar grenades for the first time last Thursday


This may not look like radical but it is coming from the man who also presided over (of memory serves) getting nuclear missiles stationed here during the SS-20 crisis when he was Prime Minister.* He was also ambassador to the United States between 1989 and 1995.

*Depends a little on the date. Not sure. But either he or his follower (same party) was responsible. Sparking the largest protest in Dutch history directed against the US, the Dutch government, the cold war and pleading for disarmament.

EDIT: and to reply to the original article, yeah, I agree with him.
~Aram Koopman, Knootian ambassador to the WA
"If the United Nations is a country unto itself, then the commodity it exports most is words."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
« Previous Topic · Real World News · Next Topic »
Add Reply