Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Hello Welcome to Raceski.....Denver Broncos 3 time champions of the world.....Miami Hurricanes Alumni reunion not what was expected.....Tim Tebow we still miss you...
Welcome to Raceski. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Good and Bad of Wikipedia
Topic Started: Apr 30 2007, 02:35 PM (123 Views)
KK3869
Member Avatar
Just your simple Cameron
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Sheesh.

:lol: :rolleyes:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Orangesmoke20
Member Avatar
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
:unsure:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
COOLJOE54
Member Avatar
The COOLiest
[ *  *  *  * ]
wait...i dont get it....


but i can tell you that OBT is a....uh...fun.... place i guess...lol
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KK3869
Member Avatar
Just your simple Cameron
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
The point of it is that wikipedia can be eaisly be abused by whoever writes it. This is the case, the the first two paragraphs is true which is good info, then you look at the bottom and see what the guy wrote at the bottom and you just see that this page has been abused.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dewy9
Member Avatar
7X Raceski Cup Champion
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
KK3869
Apr 30 2007, 05:34 PM
The point of it is that wikipedia can be eaisly be abused by whoever writes it. This is the case, the the first two paragraphs is true which is good info, then you look at the bottom and see what the guy wrote at the bottom and you just see that this page has been abused.

Der! It's the encyclopedia anyone can edit.

They had a mess on one part of the site after an episode of "The Office".
http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TV...Makes/800012676
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CR49
Member Avatar
"3 Can Keep a Secret if 2 are Dead"
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
The good thing is anybody can edit it, the bad thing is anybody can edit it. Our news guy on the radio show teaches at a college and says that he actually perfers students to use Wikipedia though. He said studies are showing that theres still less mistakes then a regular encyclopedia
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dewy9
Member Avatar
7X Raceski Cup Champion
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
CR49
May 1 2007, 12:28 PM
The good thing is anybody can edit it, the bad thing is anybody can edit it. Our news guy on the radio show teaches at a college and says that he actually perfers students to use Wikipedia though. He said studies are showing that theres still less mistakes then a regular encyclopedia

I had one teacher in high school who was crazy about Wiki. It was a contemporary issues class and he always liked how if it got too liberal, someone would edit it, and the same for if it got too conservative.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
COOLJOE54
Member Avatar
The COOLiest
[ *  *  *  * ]
KK3869
Apr 30 2007, 04:34 PM
The point of it is that wikipedia can be eaisly be abused by whoever writes it. This is the case, the the first two paragraphs is true which is good info, then you look at the bottom and see what the guy wrote at the bottom and you just see that this page has been abused.

...at least it's true...lol
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ram Jam
Member Avatar
In It 2 Win It
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
CR49
May 1 2007, 12:28 PM
The good thing is anybody can edit it, the bad thing is anybody can edit it. Our news guy on the radio show teaches at a college and says that he actually perfers students to use Wikipedia though. He said studies are showing that theres still less mistakes then a regular encyclopedia

Did Wikipedia conduct this survey?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nate
Member Avatar
Wishes he could be like David
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
2_Brew_Crew
May 1 2007, 09:24 PM
CR49
May 1 2007, 12:28 PM
The good thing is anybody can edit it, the bad thing is anybody can edit it. Our news guy on the radio show teaches at a college and says that he actually perfers students to use Wikipedia though. He said studies are showing that theres still less mistakes then a regular encyclopedia

Did Wikipedia conduct this survey?

more than likely
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply