Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Hello Welcome to Raceski.....Denver Broncos 3 time champions of the world.....Miami Hurricanes Alumni reunion not what was expected.....Tim Tebow we still miss you...
Welcome to Raceski. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Rudd to Drive #88
Topic Started: Jan 6 2007, 05:06 PM (190 Views)
bdog2924
Member Avatar
Go Gordon and Sorenson!
[ *  *  * ]
Sources close to Robert Yates Racing told ESPN.com Wednesday that Ricky Rudd's Snickers Ford will carry the #88 in 2007. An announcement is expected as soon as this weekend, one source said. Since the mid-December announcement that Rudd would return to Nextel Cup Series racing following a year layoff, considerable speculation has centered on what number his RYR Ford would carry. Team officials were undecided and a bit evasive during a conference call following the announcement, leading many to speculate the number would switch to# 28 -- the number carried by Yates' first-ever Cup Series entry from its inception through 2003, when the car was switched to #38. Asked his preference, Rudd said he'd take the #28, which he drove for Yates from 2000-2002, posting three wins and 34 top-five finishes. But he'll get the #88, a decision made based on a 2002 agreement between RYR and Texaco/Havoline, sources said. The agreement, sources said, was that RYR could keep the #28 when Texaco left for Chip Ganassi Racing [#42 Dodge], but that Yates would wait several years to run the number. Yates and Masterfoods -- Snickers' parent company -- wanted to run the #28, but couldn't reach the required agreement with Texaco to do so, sources said.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
HuskyMan20
Member Avatar
Don't bullshit a bullshitter!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
:woot: GO RICKY!!! Was hoping he'd drive the 28 :(
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JetBlack3
Member Avatar
I am the tag team champions
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
88 is more fittin with how much that thing got tore up this season....no point in Ricky damagin the 28s legacy anymore
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Orangesmoke20
Member Avatar
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
bdog2924
Jan 6 2007, 05:06 PM
wanted to run the #28, but couldn't reach the required agreement with Texaco to do so, sources said.

wtf why would texaco have a say in it the number is property of ryr
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JetBlack3
Member Avatar
I am the tag team champions
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Must be a non use clause in their split contract
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KK3869
Member Avatar
Just your simple Cameron
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
pfff, bull crap.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Texaco and Yates agreed that Yates could keep the 28 as long as he didn't use it for several years.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
grey__fox
Member Avatar
Yep. It's me.
[ *  *  *  * ]
It's been several years though....WTF?

Anywho...GO RICKY
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

grey__fox
Jan 8 2007, 01:16 PM
It's been several years though....WTF?

Anywho...GO RICKY

Four years isn't exactly several.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
grey__fox
Member Avatar
Yep. It's me.
[ *  *  *  * ]
...but it's enough.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Obviously it isn't or the 28 would be on the car.

Get a clue.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
grey__fox
Member Avatar
Yep. It's me.
[ *  *  *  * ]
Thank you, Mr. Politically Correct.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Orangesmoke20
Member Avatar
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
what the fuck does PC have to do with this?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

He's an idiot.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
grey__fox
Member Avatar
Yep. It's me.
[ *  *  *  * ]
No, you're the idiot for constantly lashing out at me for every comment I make just because it isn't good enough for you, or make sense to you.

And for your information...


Advertisement


Top Web Results for "several"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1375–1425; late ME < AF < ML séparālis, equiv. to L sépar separate + -ālis -al1]
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source sev·er·al (sěv'ər-əl, sěv'rəl) Pronunciation Key
adj.
Being of a number more than two or three but not many: several miles away.
Single; distinct: "Pshaw! said I, with an air of carelessness, three several times" (Laurence Sterne).
Respectively different; various: They parted and went their several ways. See Synonyms at distinct.
Law Relating separately to each party of a bond or note.

pron. (used with a pl. verb)
An indefinite but small number; some or a few: Several of the workers went home sick.


[Middle English, separate, from Anglo-Norman, from Medieval Latin sēparālis, sēperālis, from Latin sēpar, from sēparāre, to separate; see separate.]

sev'er·al·ly adv.






Translation: Get a clue.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

Everyone's definition of several is different. The definition we're talking about is the definition given to it by Texaco. In this case, four years isn't several.

Get a clue.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
grey__fox
Member Avatar
Yep. It's me.
[ *  *  *  * ]
...which is why I questioned Texaco's "definition" in the first place. How many years does it have to be?

Get a clue. And get off my back.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

You're an idiot. If you want to make a big deal out of how much or how little several is then buy a freakin race team.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
grey__fox
Member Avatar
Yep. It's me.
[ *  *  *  * ]
Did I strike a chord with somebody?

Boo hoo.

It wasn't a big deal until YOU made it a big deal, idiot.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

You're the one whining about Snickers not letting them use it.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Frvrth247
Member Avatar
3X Raceski Cup Champion
[ *  *  *  * ]
Who cares what number he has. All that matters is, he is back.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
grey__fox
Member Avatar
Yep. It's me.
[ *  *  *  * ]
HomeDepot20TS
Jan 9 2007, 02:38 PM
You're the one whining about Snickers not letting them use it.

Don't you mean Texaco? :rolleyes:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Orangesmoke20
Member Avatar
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
grey__fox
Jan 9 2007, 01:24 PM
Did I strike a chord with somebody?

Boo hoo.

It wasn't a big deal until YOU made it a big deal, idiot.

no the big deal is obvioisly being created by you i dont see aaron takeing the time to fine an internet deffinition of the word several when any and every idiot already know what it means
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deleted User
Deleted User

grey__fox
Jan 9 2007, 01:55 PM
HomeDepot20TS
Jan 9 2007, 02:38 PM
You're the one whining about Snickers not letting them use it.

Don't you mean Texaco? :rolleyes:

You know what I mean bonehead.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
luigistarted06
Member Avatar
I like it in and around my mouth.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
28 woulda' been best but at least he's back
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · NASCAR Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply