| Welcome to Raceski. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| entry list as of now; not official | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 9 2004, 08:48 PM (1,768 Views) | |
| Kamikaze | Jun 11 2004, 11:23 PM Post #51 |
![]()
Go Hendrick Motorsports!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks DDrosback, I think I get it now, if you are correct. *please be correct, please be correct, please...* So, say the min is 40 and the max is 60, I might have 45 (5-50+5) 55 but maybe you could have 40 (10-50+10) 60. So, I would be more mid pack but you would never be sure if you were going to win, or run like crap? |
![]() |
|
| Orangesmoke20 | Jun 11 2004, 11:28 PM Post #52 |
|
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
basically yeah if your min is 40 and max is 60 your gonna get anumber somewhere inbetween there during the race |
![]() |
|
| Kamikaze | Jun 11 2004, 11:34 PM Post #53 |
![]()
Go Hendrick Motorsports!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
At least we have over 10 races to figure this out. |
![]() |
|
| 20tc | Jun 12 2004, 02:17 AM Post #54 |
|
Raceski Cup Champion
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thats what I said...................sorta
|
![]() |
|
| JetBlack3 | Jun 12 2004, 07:27 AM Post #55 |
![]()
I am the tag team champions
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Think of it this way everyone. Instead of 1 set of attributes we will need 2 sets. One for the min column, and another for the max column Ok for example. Lets say the attributes for the min is 50. And the attributes for the max is 100. Those numbers are what you get to spread out over the 15 catergories Example of sheet: --------------------------Min--------------Max Driver: Aggression------------0------------------5 <-------- Notice the min has to be lower Consistancy----------5----------------10 Finishing---------------30----------------60 Qualifying-------------5-------------------5 <--------but can be equal Road Course---------3-------------------5 Short Track-----------2-------------------5 Speedway-------------0-------------------0 Superspeedway-----0-------------------0 Vehicle: Areo---------------------5------------------10 Chasis------------------0--------------------0 Engine------------------0--------------------0 Reliability--------------0--------------------0 Pit Crew: Consistancy-----------0--------------------0 Speed-------------------0--------------------0 Strategy----------------0--------------------0 ____________________________________ ----------------------------50------------------100 All you will need to do is fill out 2 sets of attributes and make sure the min is less then or equal to the max. Hope this makes more sense |
![]() |
|
| Kamikaze | Jun 12 2004, 07:02 PM Post #56 |
![]()
Go Hendrick Motorsports!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So what is the max for the min and the max for the max? Right there you have them min=50 and max=100. |
![]() |
|
| d_drosback29 | Jun 12 2004, 07:18 PM Post #57 |
|
Happy Harvick
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That makes more sense. But if you can keep both sides the same, then there is still the chance that you can keep one area or whatever consistant, and I thought the point was that it would make the cars inconsistant? |
![]() |
|
| Kamikaze | Jun 12 2004, 07:29 PM Post #58 |
![]()
Go Hendrick Motorsports!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Shhhhh, be quiet dude. This means that your attributes should still be useful. |
![]() |
|
| Orangesmoke20 | Jun 12 2004, 07:38 PM Post #59 |
|
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
no the point was to help the inconsistant become more consistant |
![]() |
|
| d_drosback29 | Jun 12 2004, 07:44 PM Post #60 |
|
Happy Harvick
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well I'm just makin sure I understand it correctly. Like I said, there's always a way around it! |
![]() |
|
| Orangesmoke20 | Jun 12 2004, 07:46 PM Post #61 |
|
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
there really hasnt been any dominent car in the cup series yeah the 81 has a big points lead but thats more from being the only one who never gets caught up in the wrecks |
![]() |
|
| d_drosback29 | Jun 12 2004, 08:01 PM Post #62 |
|
Happy Harvick
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Exactly. Its pretty boring if you ask me. The Truck series is the best! I mean, look at the standings! I have just as many DNF's as the points leader has in top 5s!!! Thats crazy!! Yeah, there are some way in the back, but you got a great battle in the front. In the Cup series, its so equal that no one can really do anything. The 81 car is just gonna walk away with it all, and thats not very exciting. |
![]() |
|
| Orangesmoke20 | Jun 12 2004, 08:11 PM Post #63 |
|
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i think its way better to have equil cars then have the same person win each week whats the point of keeping track if you know whos gonna win |
![]() |
|
| d_drosback29 | Jun 12 2004, 08:17 PM Post #64 |
|
Happy Harvick
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But the same person doesn't win! We just had yet another first time winner! I don't know. Maybe its just that I'm doing better in Trucks than here, but I just think the Trucks has been more entertaining this season. But I'll be back in both, so hopefully they'll both be just as exciting next season. |
![]() |
|
| Orangesmoke20 | Jun 12 2004, 08:22 PM Post #65 |
|
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i really wouldn be suprised to see somebody other then the 81 walk away with the title one bad race for him and one great race by anybody in the top 5 and they are gona be within strikeing distance and we do have 3 short tracks left so anything could happen |
![]() |
|
| Kamikaze | Jun 12 2004, 08:23 PM Post #66 |
![]()
Go Hendrick Motorsports!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I want it to be competitive too, but I still want to be the champion so whatever. |
![]() |
|
| JetBlack3 | Jun 13 2004, 07:21 AM Post #67 |
![]()
I am the tag team champions
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well if i made the 2 set numbers similar, ie 100 and 150 then yes you would still dominate. But they wont be that close.
|
![]() |
|
| JetBlack3 | Jun 13 2004, 07:24 AM Post #68 |
![]()
I am the tag team champions
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
there is no min for min and max for max (well i will have a cap but dont worry about that) Think of it as attribute set 1 (min) and Attribute set 2 (max) |
![]() |
|
| HomeDepot20TS | Jun 13 2004, 08:36 AM Post #69 |
|
Unregistered
|
So basically we give two numbers and our attribute for the race falls somewhere in between those two numbers, right? Or am I just confused as GTMC? |
|
|
| JetBlack3 | Jun 13 2004, 08:50 AM Post #70 |
![]()
I am the tag team champions
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah basically. the lower number if how bad you could race and the higher number is how good you could be in a race |
![]() |
|
| HomeDepot20TS | Jun 13 2004, 08:56 AM Post #71 |
|
Unregistered
|
I used to mess around with those on NASCAR Racing 3. LMAO I had Gordon's points at like a minimum of 150 (As low as it could go) and a maximum of 151.
|
|
|
| dole | Jun 13 2004, 01:44 PM Post #72 |
|
Unregistered
|
I was there a few weeks ago, just got caught 3 races in a row in others BS |
|
|
| dole | Jun 13 2004, 01:47 PM Post #73 |
|
Unregistered
|
B) :ph34r: :shifty: shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh |
|
|
| Kamikaze | Jun 13 2004, 03:35 PM Post #74 |
![]()
Go Hendrick Motorsports!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I understand it a lot more than I did. All I want now is to get to the end of the season and test it out. Hopefully we'll get a few test races to put it to work before the season actually starts. |
![]() |
|
| Orangesmoke20 | Jun 25 2004, 01:55 PM Post #75 |
|
Too hot to handle.. too cold to hold... ohhhhhh yeahhhhh!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
uodated the entry list and lotto list 6/25/04 |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · The Raceski Insider · Next Topic » |






![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




