| Welcome to The City State of Q102. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The Voice Of Democracy | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 17 2006, 08:09 PM (1,964 Views) | |
| Nevareion | Feb 9 2006, 01:52 PM Post #16 |
|
Bringing fabulousness closer
![]()
|
I am sure that unfair influence on the judicial process will definately encourage people to trust you with high office. |
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Feb 9 2006, 06:52 PM Post #17 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
Bunnies: Ah, but we know we could do better, and by saying so we point out to the people that their might be a better option. It's up to them to give us the chance, and put us to the test. (I just relized I haven't said it, but I really don't hate you guys ;) All IC.) |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Feb 10 2006, 04:30 PM Post #18 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Wow I can't believe I've missed all this. A few points:
"Ruinning the region" eh Zak? A poignant typo there! A Freudiant slip maybe? :P
Bunnies, I presume "testing" would mean the UOC as government. Then yes, test us! Voters, test us! Vote UOC!
Nev, I know I would definately keep party politics and judicial duties separate. I'm pretty sure LD and CM can be trusted too. So people, you can trust your judges! When we have those judge caps on, we become robots that can only think objectively, honest! :D (OOC: it seems a matter of custom to point out this is all IC, so I shall too. Love you all really. :) ) |
![]() |
|
| Republic of Aaronyne | Feb 11 2006, 03:30 AM Post #19 |
![]() ![]()
|
I can trust that judges that are from the UOC can and will keep party poltics and the judicary seperate. I do believe that Zakaroo's typo is a mistake and he meant that we are all busy running the region. |
![]() |
|
| Calm Minds | Feb 11 2006, 03:46 AM Post #20 |
![]() ![]()
|
but this way is makes for better fun STOP THE PRESSES new headline Zak is goingto ruin the region |
![]() |
|
| FluffyPinkBunnyGirl | Feb 11 2006, 12:18 PM Post #21 |
|
Temptress
![]()
|
Pssst! Aaronyne! *whispers* :secrets: typo - Zak's a girl :P @JB You're right, its up to the voters to test you... but don't get your hopes up :D |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Feb 11 2006, 01:02 PM Post #22 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Sorry Bunnies but my hopes are already soaring over the tops of sky-scrapers and the like. Oh watch those hopes fly so high! :D |
![]() |
|
| FluffyPinkBunnyGirl | Feb 11 2006, 03:09 PM Post #23 |
|
Temptress
![]()
|
Well we'll have to do something about that, yknow...
:P can't have hopes disrupting air traffic now, can we? |
![]() |
|
| lamedud | Feb 11 2006, 09:34 PM Post #24 |
![]()
Councillor of Q102
![]()
|
I don't think the PPP has the commitment to stay in government. Do i recall the phrase 'its boring being neutral' from some members of the PPP? Do i smell the words 'jumping', 'on', 'the' and 'bandwagon'? |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Feb 11 2006, 10:32 PM Post #25 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
(In a House of Commons stylee) "Here here! Waaay!" (Is it just me, or is the atmosphere of the House of Commons much like that of a football match, and the House of Lords comparable to a morgue?) |
![]() |
|
| Republic of Aaronyne | Feb 12 2006, 10:11 AM Post #26 |
![]() ![]()
|
i must totaly disagree. it was the legacy of naverion when he was voted in to have us start moving away from our nuetrality and be more involved in inter-regional relationships. |
![]() |
|
| FluffyPinkBunnyGirl | Feb 12 2006, 03:33 PM Post #27 |
|
Temptress
![]()
|
that's cause they're all about ready to die anyway :) and i fully support aaronyne's comment, the direction the PPP is taking was introduced as a proposal when the UOC was still in political diapers. plus, it shows stronger character to make a decision, then recognise and admit that it is wrong and change your course than to make a decision and stick with it even though you know it is the wrong decision. the PPP was originally neutral, and we've since realised that this isnt the best way to move the region forward, we're willing to admit we were wrong. Now we're trying out being less neutral, and seeing if that works any better. Whereas the UOC seems to be sticking to its guns no matter what. |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Feb 12 2006, 06:06 PM Post #28 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
I accuse the PPP of flip-flopping! (OOC: hahahahahaha! God I never thought I'd get to say that.) |
![]() |
|
| FluffyPinkBunnyGirl | Feb 12 2006, 06:55 PM Post #29 |
|
Temptress
![]()
|
that just evokes the wrong image. i prefer to think of the PPP as "flexible according to the needs of the region". |
![]() |
|
| Calm Minds | Feb 12 2006, 07:56 PM Post #30 |
![]() ![]()
|
yes we are sticking to our guns, for the simple fact that we think it is a good way to go. we believe that we should not lose our identity and gain a more extreme position. yes we should work to make the region seen, but not this way. We need to get out there, not through alliances but through the people, when was the last ime we contacted a region? when was the last time we sent an member to a NS event that was there as an offical rep. of Q102, this is how we are going to make Q102 a major player in Nation States |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · The Lobby · Next Topic » |










