| Welcome to The City State of Q102. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The United Opposition Coalition; [OOC UOC Party only] | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 22 2005, 06:27 PM (3,701 Views) | |
| Blue Tiger | Jan 24 2006, 10:43 PM Post #46 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
What exactly are your polcies? [Yeah, I'm not a memeber, but I could be interested...] |
![]() |
|
| lamedud | Jan 24 2006, 11:18 PM Post #47 |
![]()
Councillor of Q102
![]()
|
Read the topic marked - United Opposition Coalition Policies. :lol: - its in political affairs dude. |
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Jan 24 2006, 11:49 PM Post #48 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
(DOH!) Well, after reading it, it sounds like this is my party. Too bad I already posted in the other one. Oh well, I'll go clear that up. |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Jan 25 2006, 02:47 PM Post #49 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
To clarify, Blue Tiger, you would like to join the UOC? If so, yay! :D Or were you just suggesting we have your vote? If so, yay! :D |
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Jan 25 2006, 03:12 PM Post #50 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
No no, I want to join, that's why I put the banner in my sig. |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Jan 25 2006, 03:24 PM Post #51 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Oh yes of course! Well may I be the first to congratulate you on picking the finest political party of Q102 to join. We shall have a party to celebrate! With cakes and whatnot. :D |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Jan 25 2006, 04:18 PM Post #52 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
If members would take a look at the "Party Policy" forum, I have posted in there on the party's behalf. I'm pretty sure you'd all agree with what I put. We should avoid mentioning any tabloid stuff in there 'cos I don't think it'd impress. Let's see what the PPP come back with, and then rip them apart!
:P edit: In the above forum, Nev asked:
I thought this was best for Calm Minds to field, as shadow Foreign Affairs Minister. My personal opinion on regional numbers is that it is of secondary importance to activity of present members, but I didn't want to answer this without asking the rest of the party's opinion. |
![]() |
|
| Calm Minds | Jan 25 2006, 05:31 PM Post #53 |
![]() ![]()
|
well i put my :2cents: in there too and welcome tothe party BT, if you dont mind me calling you that, and sorry about the nutering. it was a nessary action to protect her bunniness |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Jan 25 2006, 07:44 PM Post #54 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
I'd say that whilst not being neutral would boost our notoriety, it may bring us into danger. Thus, I don't believe a black and white situation can be concluded on this. An analysis of independent situation may be preferable. Would you agree CM? I thought I wouldn't answer as it's your field. :) |
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Jan 25 2006, 08:23 PM Post #55 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
No I don't mind being called BT and WHAT?!?! What are you talking about?!?!?! :o |
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Jan 25 2006, 09:39 PM Post #56 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
He has no foreign policy. Are you guys readin this? |
![]() |
|
| Calm Minds | Jan 25 2006, 10:16 PM Post #57 |
![]() ![]()
|
there are some that may say that.....but as i thought up the idea, and i am regeting not putting a more defined deffinition in the bill that was passed, is nutral in respect to the poeple and regions in nation states, to hold outside of the overall invader/defender relations in NS, eg the ADN and the RLA, and DEN, the superregional networks thats only perpuse is to disrupt the other, the system that has been set up as the "only" way to to play nation states ignoring all others. when people come into Q102 i want them to be known as ____ from _____, not _____ from ______, sworn member of the (insert invader/defender org here) to crush all those that seek to do harm against ______. when bam from the ASE or Party for Canada, or ZO for TWP come here they are just that 3 people from another region nothing more nothing less. the whole system makes me head hurt, and once poeple see that we want to part of it, they will not see us a target nor a potent threat or a vivable tagert (we are way to big to be invaded easily now, even more so that we have an active founder). so to wrap things up....we are not a target becasue we dont make ourselves one, we are nether right nor left, we do not invade of defende, and we acept all into q102 with open arms and never pass judgment on those that enter, but welcome them warmly. does that fullful your request for a responce...and i will copy and paste this in the other thread becasue i do not want o retype all this @BT i thikn LM was making a joke becasye he is the FM, not taking a shot at us |
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Jan 26 2006, 08:42 AM Post #58 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
No, I was laughing at the joke without getting stuck with the plain old "lol" (though I should have cleared up the fact that I was sarcastic) But anyway, PC made a good point here:
This should be our focus. Becasue OOC, this whole thing is only a game, and taking risks and picking sides is part of the fun, and IC, every nation and region wants to be a "power house". So why stay neutral? I don't mean go off endorsing everything or whatever, but we should try to become main players in NS, and neutrallity isn't the way to do that. Just one question, what does he mean by Q102-Canada ambassador protocol? |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Jan 26 2006, 02:44 PM Post #59 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
I really need to get up on my Foreign Affairs knowledge. Half of this is way over my head. BT, I don't have a clue what the Canada-Q102 protocol is, so I'm just as curious as you. |
![]() |
|
| Nevareion | Jan 26 2006, 03:14 PM Post #60 |
|
Bringing fabulousness closer
![]()
|
For info: you can find it here: http://q102.org/index.php?showtopic=1225 and the inter regional conference run to create it here: http://q102.org/index.php?showforum=144[/admin help] |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · The Lobby · Next Topic » |







