| Welcome to The City State of Q102. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| The United Opposition Coalition; [OOC UOC Party only] | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 22 2005, 06:27 PM (3,691 Views) | |
| Joe Bobs | Mar 21 2006, 04:47 PM Post #181 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Peachy, I suggest reading the new ambassador's report, the "Suggestion" thread and the two threads relating to party passwords. That's what's been a-happening. |
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Mar 22 2006, 05:15 AM Post #182 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
Password recived. I don't think we should bother moving it. now that we have our own fourm, are we really going to use this thread? |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Mar 22 2006, 01:19 PM Post #183 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Yes. You see, the closed forum is solely for tactical discussion. If we closed off policy discussion, how would ne members know whether they want to join or not? And where would they sign up? We only need protection for tactical discussion. If tactical discussion is not protected, then anyone can read it and there's no point discussing it. |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Mar 26 2006, 06:14 PM Post #184 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Right. If I win the election, who wants a councillor position? I'm working on a list, but there's nopoint me putitng someone down if they don't want to do it. Also, any thoughts on ideas I should use when running. So far: Increase regional numbers to 100 (Possible.) A councillor activity check, so they must check in, say, weekly, and delegate every three days min. Continuation of other ideas Increase in foreign affairs. I know that our ambassadors aren't all that active, and the Q102-Canada protocol needs to be enforced by the Foreign Affairs Councillor I have a few other ideas, but I'm largely running them under the "continuation" principle. Obviously, I'll name them in speechs and so forth. |
![]() |
|
| lamedud | Mar 26 2006, 09:02 PM Post #185 |
![]()
Councillor of Q102
![]()
|
I'd be happy to fall into office as a councillor dude. |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Mar 27 2006, 04:34 PM Post #186 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Right. I have written my list, and much of it is based on acivity and experience rather than party allegiance, although all of you are included. I am waiting for Nev to get back to me on whether or not he wants a position. Also, I have made two positions for Councillor for Immigration and Officials, in the hope that this will boost recruitment and therefore numbers. I would like anyone to post here, or PM me, or post in the "Delegate Issue" thread (where I shall also post it) if they want to change their position or do not want a position or feel that they could handle more than I've allocated them.
Also, I'd like feedback if anyone thinks I've made a huge error of judgement anywhere. Thanks. |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Mar 27 2006, 05:55 PM Post #187 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Change to list:
Now, my only concern here is Peachy. I'm thinking maybe you won't like this new position. If so, please contact me ASAP. edit: ammended to disclude Nev, who doesn't want a position. This puts Peachydom back in the far more suitable role of Internal Affairs Minister. Also, see Delegate thread to see why I moved Zak. |
![]() |
|
| 2000AD | Mar 27 2006, 08:14 PM Post #188 |
|
Unregistered
|
Minister of foreign affairs sounds good to me. Now to increase my activity. :D |
|
|
| lamedud | Mar 27 2006, 08:30 PM Post #189 |
![]()
Councillor of Q102
![]()
|
Deputy Dawg reportin for duty. Woof. <_< |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Apr 1 2006, 04:35 PM Post #190 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
BT, are you happy with Security Minister? Also, this is the TG/PM I plan to send round for my campaign. I'd like to hear your thoughts on it. Anything I should add/remove/change?
|
![]() |
|
| Blue Tiger | Apr 3 2006, 03:49 AM Post #191 |
|
The Bluest Memeber of Q102
![]()
|
I'm cool with security minister I guess. And that's a very good TG/PM Bobs |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Apr 3 2006, 03:19 PM Post #192 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Cheers BT. And I need a brainstorm (or "thought-shower") people! I notice three of us are online, so we should be able to bounce some ideas about. What do I need to include? What strengths should I point out and weaknesses should I prepare to argue down? Don't hold back on me! :P Also, anyone notice the big PPP logo on RoA's vote page? Non-Partisan elections??? |
![]() |
|
| lamedud | Apr 3 2006, 09:08 PM Post #193 |
![]()
Councillor of Q102
![]()
|
GAh. I've been offered a place in the other delegacy if they get in... LOYALTIES??!! |
![]() |
|
| Joe Bobs | Apr 4 2006, 10:30 AM Post #194 |
|
Former Delegate of Q102
![]()
|
Yeah. I'm RoA's Deputy and I&O Councillor. It's very confusing. But at least we can't lose, LD! Anywho, you're my Deputy so there lie your loyalties. :P Maybe you'd be better neutral? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · The Lobby · Next Topic » |






