| Welcome to Nintendo Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Nintendo abandon 'Jimae-shugi'; Policy change to hopefully bring about better networks | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 31 2011, 06:38 AM (466 Views) | |
| Deleted User | May 31 2011, 06:38 AM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
So, exciting times ahead with regards to online play? It seems pretty clear that Nintendo have taken heed one of the Wii's biggest failings, its online play, and are planning on working with outside companies to hopefully provide an experience like that of XBL on its next console, something that would potentially allow for a lot more multiplayer focussed titles to be released on it. This might also mean the possibility that we'll see some of Nintendo's big hitters, Mario and Zelda titles hopefully, developed by western companies, giving them the same treatment as Retro Studios gave the Metroid franchise with Prime. |
|
|
| IceCatraz | May 31 2011, 09:20 AM Post #2 |
![]()
Roar of Mufasa
![]()
|
I dunno - Metroid is one thing, Mario is another. We've seen other companies develop Mario titles in the past, but they've never been main entries - they've only been spin offs. I wouldn't doubt another company coming in and assisting with development, ala Brawl, but I highly doubt we'll be seeing BioWare or Activision Blizzard taking a shot with a Mario title. I just don't want to see one of the best franchises of all time being fucked up - anyone picking up Zelda or Mario has massive shoes to fill, and I don't think there are many Western developers that can fit that bill. |
|
Tanks | |
![]() |
|
| Togeshroob | May 31 2011, 11:21 AM Post #3 |
|
(Temporarily closed. ...Gwaargh!) *doo wee doo wee doo*
![]()
|
^Especially not with Mario. I wouldn't mind someone else making a Mario RPG, or some other type of spin-off (like they already do), but Nintendo already does an absolutely fantastic job with the platformers (3D in particular); I would never want them to stop. Anyhow, I read this a while back, and it really makes me respect Iwata and Nintendo as a whole. Not many presidents will come out and openly admit their faults! As for Zelda, 3rd parties (albeit Japanese) have already made a couple games and done well with them, so I'm not terribly opposed. However, not just any developer should get to do it. They'd need someone who understands the framework and spirit of the series, not someone who would simply Westernize it for the sake of grit and money. Which is why I wouldn't mind seeing Retro develop one - they've shown twice now (Metroid, Donkey Kong) that they can retain a series original qualities while making something new. Oh, and as for OoT 3DS being made by a 3rd party (Grezzo, to be precise), I speculate it's only because Nintendo themselves are secretly developing an original Zelda title for the 3DS. I think that'd be awesome - have a 3rd party handle remakes and such, while Nintendo themselves makes original Zelda games. |
![]() |
|
| Reaper. | May 31 2011, 03:36 PM Post #4 |
|
censored black sheep .
|
And because they're just remaking a game that was already made by nintendo
|
|
Quotes | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| « Previous Topic · First Party Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 11:39 AM Jul 13 |
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy









