| Welcome to Free Thinkers! Log in, register an account, or post as a guest. |
| DANIEL's THESIS>. correct about STAR AGES.. | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 23 2012, 04:23 PM (440 Views) | |
| Wiolawa | Dec 23 2012, 04:23 PM Post #1 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://www.soldierhugs.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Time-and-Timelines-1.pdf the other day i was purusing DAVID WILCOCK''s site.. divinecosmos.com and "THEY" wouldnt allow me to see all of the first page.. especially about someone called DANIEL.. and the link.. supposedly of an interview with PROJECT CAMELOT... anyway i finally after much travail got to his site.. and this was an important page for me.. seems someone or others already know about the dumbing down of astronomy dealing with the age of stars.. which i have always known.. the hertzsprung-russell diagram a total farce.. glad to see this in print.. i have discussed this for years.. and most have always been silent.. like im an idiot.. including when i taught astronomy and suggested this not openly in the class but outside the class in fieldtrips to observatories in arizona ah ho WIO Edited by Wiolawa, Dec 23 2012, 04:26 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| raindrop_fiasco | Dec 23 2012, 05:00 PM Post #2 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
thank you for posting this. :) I just finished watching wilcock's interview with project camelot. enjoyed it very much and i was wondering about this, he mentions daniel in the interview. |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



