Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Free Thinkers!

Log in, register an account, or post as a guest.


Username:   Password:
Add Reply
[ti]coffee[/ti]Jupiter events - I have the logical theory; The Philosopher's Stone for the Transformation of Jupiter - Project Lucifer
Topic Started: Sep 29 2012, 12:46 AM (1,312 Views)
Jupiter
Newbie
[ * ]
Jupiter in Transformation-

Pre-Proposed Theory has the Logical Explanation for Recent Flash Events

Before any of the recent supposed four “impacts” of the last three years were witnessed on Jupiter (including the latest on September 10, 2012), author J Edward Carper had warned that we should expect strange events on the planet as a result of NASA’s previous insertion of LWRHU’s (a nuclear-powered heating device that the Galileo spacecraft and probe carried many of). Carper’s theory allows these devices to penetrate very deeply, near 80-90% Jupiter radius, before fissioning and then causing a fusion reaction, sustained; this operating in the same way a nuclear implosion device works conventionally on Earth, but much more efficiently deep inside Jupiter at 30 million bars pressure.

Jupiter supplies a very even implosion pressure mechanism on the devices, plutonium-238 supplies a rapid volume change needed at the proper time during supercritical, and the delivery devices remain intact deep into Jupiter until the proper time based on the “equation of state” of the carbon casings in which the plutonium-238/239 pellets are carried and protected. Plutonium-238 and 239 are both fissionable (capable of sustained fission), and Galileo’s probe, called GAEP, delivered 15 Light-Weight Radio-isotopic Heater Units (LWRHU’s) intact behind a heat shield into Jupiter in 1995, and that is what makes this scenario possible.

Since the time of the writing of Carper’s first articles starting in 2003 (a prelude to the book) there have been four supposed major and highly visible “impacts” that have not matched the signature of what we saw with the SL-9 impacts of 1994, or a signature that was even plausible given all of the parameters (a reminder that Shoemaker-Levy-9 comet impacts generated heat that was orders of magnitude LESS than what the proposed LWRHU fission/fusion reaction would generate).

Carper’s theory contends that NONE of the last four said “impacts” of July 2009, June 2010, August 2010, and September 2012, are actually impacts, but really events generated from deep inside Jupiter as a result of a fission to fusion reaction in July of 2009 that has been consolidated to a very modest portion of the center of Jupiter, and whose 5-10 million Kelvin heat has been working its way outward since then to higher levels causing electrical disturbances on the way; these disturbances are what is causing the massive electrical discharges witness in the last three “impacts”, that are not “hits” or “impacts” but flashes of lightning of immense proportions as Jupiter is now forced to keep rebalancing itself electrically.



To quote Dan Petersen’s original report when he visually witnessed the recent Sept. 2012 flash event: “I observed an explosion on Jupiter this morning!" He did not say “minor flash” or anything of the sort. He used the word “explosion” because of the great magnitude of the flashing light of 1.5 to 2 seconds that he had just witnessed. This latest flash is the most intense of the recent three flashes we have so far beheld, and if we have seen three on the dayside of Jupiter, likely we have missed seeing an equal amount on the night side.

The July 2009 “impact” event came in the form of a massive black scar that appeared suddenly on Jupiter (sometimes called the “Wesley mark” after the astronomer who spotted it first). Carper’s theory contends this was the first indication of a major disturbance at the center of Jupiter; in fact, he contends this was a long and large “thermal venting shaft” that was created during the initiation of a fusion reaction deep below (near the center of the planet). The shaft was formed from heat and heated particles trying to escape the innards of Jupiter having fusion-level heat and less density than allowed there (heat of 5 million Kelvin), and some of this heat and material violently erupted out of Jupiter July 19, 2009 causing the “Wesley mark”. Since then, the said reaction (weak when compared to the Sun’s) has consolidated at Jupiter’s center and is slowly working its heat outward level by level.

Note the said Wesley scar, once spectrum-analyzed, was said to contain “abundant silica” which would not be possible for comet debris. So scientists reversed their theory on asteroids at Jupiter and claimed that the scar had to have been caused by an asteroid with silica (yet Jupiter was supposed to have cleared all asteroids out of its realm millions of years ago). If they had read Carper’s account they would know that silica is also found at the center of Jupiter and incredibly some of it was being expelled to the top!

Also note that the two imaged enormous flashes on Jupiter in 2010 were ANTIPODAL, that means “on direct opposite ends of the sphere and going through the exact center”; this when the locations are charted with respect to true internal Jupiter core rotation, known as “L3” longitude coordinates. This is significant because it further supports the contention that these flashes are actually electrical surges or discharges sourcing from Jupiter’s center! The reason for a 78-day delay between the two flashes in 2010 is likely from one side of the electrical discharge encountering more resistance than the other.

The most recent flash is by conventional theory too close to the equator to be an impact (Jupiter’s gravitational dynamics tend to send impactors further north or south), and like the other flashes, produced absolutely no debris, and what is more, no incoming objects were spotted for any on the “flash impacts”. What the flashes actually portend, especially the latest, is that indeed if such a fusion reaction were started, similar to the one in the Sun but much smaller and less intense, it is ongoing, sustained, and continues to develop and change Jupiter from the inside out! ~

Additional author’s notes:

There are these Jupiter hang-ups some people have, but they are not justified:

1) "Jupiter is too small to be a star, not enough mass."

The "mass" problem is why it can't create temps by itself to go to fusion, but if you MANIPULATE how the temperature is created, then you have solved the problem. At that point Jupiter self-regulates the intensity of the fusion reaction that it can handle, which is modest compared to the Sun, but still viable (smaller proportion of inside sphere actually in fusion, and this in lower fusion density as compared to the Sun).

2) "Everything would have burned up from the craft upon entry."

This is certainly NOT true because they forgot the GAEP (Probe) had 15 LWRHU's that went in BEHIND a heat shield. After that the "equation of state" allows the carbon casings to bring the plutonium deep into Jupiter without melting.

3) "The primary plutonium used (Pu-238) is not fissionable or fissile."

Absolutely FALSE. It has been proven to be fissionable and fissile (1962 Nevada test proved it capable of a sustained fission reaction, additionally Richard Garwin of the Jason Group showed Galileo’s proportional mix to be viable). There is also Pu-239 along with it, which is even MORE fissile. Additionally, it is not necessary to have a huge kiloton result; only a small one, any initial fissile fissioning event is all that is required to produce the tremendous heat to set off fusion. With such a great containment time in 30+ million bars of pressure deep inside Jupiter, over one trillion Kelvin can be achieved. This is overkill for fusion to start in the liquid-metallic hydrogen.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jupiter
Newbie
[ * ]
Other notes:

Dan Peterson initially reported the flash at +12 north latitude. This coordinate needs to be corrected as the flash does not appear that far north but much closer to the equator at around +5 or less.

What this LATEST September 2012 flash most likely verifies is that the initial fusion reaction that produced the “Wesley mark” and subsequent antipodal electrical discharges DID NOT FIZZLE OUT because over two years after these first imaged flashes we have another colossal “explosion”. So, congratulations should be in order for the makers of this thing; it appears you have pulled off an astounding feat, the implications and timing of which we still do no fully know!

For J Edward Carper’s theory in detail check out the book and eBook:

"The Philosopher's Stone for the Transformation of Jupiter - Project Lucifer"

http://www.amazon.com/Philosophers-Stone-Transformation-Jupiter-ebook/dp/B004Y6515A/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1348062232&sr=8-1&keywords=j+carper
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jupiter
Newbie
[ * ]
I am the author of the book desribed and I will answer questions...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Wiolawa
Member Avatar
Advanced Member
[ *  *  * ]
1) JUPITER IS NOT JUST A GAS BALL
2) THIS WAS A TRAIN OF OBJECTS THAT WERE MEANT TO DESTROY CERTAIN AREAS OF JUPITER>> WHERE POPULATIONS WERE LOCATED>> THEIR ATMOSPHERE
3) LUCIFER>> I DO NOT CONGRATULATE>>
4) IF YOU WROTE THE BOOK I SUGGEST YOU GO INTO ADOBE PHOTOSHOP AND LOOK CLOSELY AT WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OBJECTS THEMSELVES>> HAVE U?

i did years ago..

if you look at NEWSPAPER ROCK IN UTAH>> U WILL SEE THE ANCIENT PETROGLYPH DRAWINGS OF THE 6 TOED BEINGS THAT MIGRATED AND LEFT EARTH FOR JUPITER>>..

ah ho WIOLAWA
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jupiter
Newbie
[ * ]
Interesting...

Wiolawa, you should get my book and see what you think. I correctly predicted the anomalous activity on Jupiter in recent years, namely the marks and flashes, so this lends credence to my theory.

Thanks, JEC
Edited by Jupiter, Sep 29 2012, 08:58 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Cooper Blue created by SlyCooperFan1 from Outline & ZNR