| Welcome to Free Thinkers! Log in, register an account, or post as a guest. |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Megatons of Aluminum to Rain Down Globally | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 25 2010, 08:30 PM (958 Views) | |
| yass | Aug 24 2013, 12:43 AM Post #6 |
|
'night owl'
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(Posting replies as-is) I was thinking about how those chemicals would get in our water supply and if we weren't breathing it, we'd be drinking it. Also, was searching around and landed an interesting page on the topic:
I thought about my favorite campsite that I camped at extensively about 10 years ago. I'd been away from it a while and when I visited again there were dead trees fallen everywhere. I suppose it was a storm that might have knocked them down, but it was standing dead trees that were knocked down. It ruined the campsite, blocked access to in roads and made huge obstacles to other special areas on the campground. I wondered then why all those trees were dead. What killed all those trees? When I camped there I saw row after row of chemtrails being laid out in the sky above me, and I thought it was the oddest thing being that the area was so remote with very few humans that could be affected and I couldn't understand why they were being sprayed out there. That was prior to the dead fallen trees and I wonder if there's any link. From the same page we learn that Monsanto is marketing a new aluminum resistant gene.
Even though my thoughts earlier were that we'd ingest the lithium through contaminated water, this puts a new take on it:
When the thought came to me about the tainted water, I'd remembered the bit about lithium (because the idea of it had an impact on me) but I'd neglected to register the bit about aluminum from the op, I think because I'd posted about it previously and so I was just absorbing the bit about lithium. |
| -Love will lead | |
![]() |
|
| yass | Aug 24 2013, 12:56 AM Post #7 |
|
'night owl'
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I typed out some of that text and put it into search hoping to find a full copy/paste version of that article (to continue reading beyond conceivably damage the fin- ...). I didn't find it but my searching led to another article about aluminum. The trail began here http://chemtrails.cc/ in the comments section:
The title was hot linked but resulted in a 404 page so I took it to the waybackmachine. http://web.archive.org/web/20120702025013/http://www.mtshastanews.com/opinions/x1950206316/Citizens-seeking-answers-to-aluminum-contamination-concerns Interestingly, though the word 'chemtrail' does not appear even once in the article viewers are encouraged to do their own research and start by visiting links to pages which all have information about chemtrails.
When I opened the americanskywatch link I was in for a surprise! Check it out: http://americanskywatch.com American what? I put that link into the waybackmachine also and got a much different result: http://web.archive.org/web/20101104125752/http://americanskywatch.com/ http://www.californiaskywatch.com/ had an old picture of a chemtrail: ![]()
http://koenig2099.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/chemtrails-in-1949-you-gotta-see-this/ Spoiler: click to toggle original source: pg 2 http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=SFOYbPikdlgC&dat=19490904&printsec=frontpage&hl=en I searched for evidence of dead trees on Mount Shasta and I turned up an article where residents were reporting dead fish and trees but it was blamed on water bottlers hogging all the water up. My brain's too tired to figure out geographically where the water bottler's are in relation to these residents... like below where they live? On the other side of the mountain where they live? And I wondered why the water bottlers weren't running out of water to bottle being the condition has become so extreme for these residents of Mount Shasta. For what it's worth:
It was reported the the spring dried up in 2007 and the Citizens seeking answers to aluminum contamination concerns article is dated 2009 but it doesn't necessarily rule out chemtrail spraying as a possible culprit. |
| -Love will lead | |
![]() |
|
| yass | Aug 24 2013, 12:59 AM Post #8 |
|
'night owl'
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I had this posted yet elsewhere, think I'll include for research purposes (i.e. the picture.) Citizens seeking answers to aluminum contamination concerns Posted Mar 25, 2009 @ 04:24 PM Guest opinion by Rose Taylor, Francis Mangels, Dane Wigington, Dave Casebeer, Rosalind Peterson Mount Shasta, Calif. — Last year citizens from Siskiyou and Shasta Counties submitted water tests results to their city and county officials. These tests came from snow pack, rain and pond water samples taken in both counties. Basic Labs, a state certified lab in Redding, performed the testing. The citizens urged local governments to conduct their own water tests (costing no more than a hundred dollars for each county). If these tests produced similar results, then the citizens expected the proper agencies to be contacted to investigate the off-the-chart levels of aluminum showing up in their counties’ surface waters. Of the three-dozen tests submitted, all showed near or over the MCL (maximum contaminate level) for aluminum in drinking water for the State of California. The following are some of the highest samples documented: Snow pack sampled at Ski Bowl on Mt. Shasta tested for aluminum at 61,000 ug/L or 61 times the MCL. After 1-½ years of exposure to the atmosphere, a Shasta County pond (rubber lined) tested for aluminum at 375,000 ug/l or 375 times the MCL. This came as a surprise to the property owner because the pond tested “0” for aluminum when it was first filled and is in a “filtered location” (forested hilltop away from highway or industry). When a hydro-geologist was shown the tests, he stated, “unless you live near an Alcoa Aluminum plant, there is no way these types of metals (barium has also been detected) should be showing up in your pond or rainwater samples, in any quantity.” The Pit River sample tested at 4,610,000 ug/L, which is 4,610 times the MCL. Aluminum and barium are considered highly toxic to humans, animals and plants. The accumulation factor of these metals should not be discounted. To ignore them, we do so at our own peril. What we do know about aluminum in CA waters Rosalind Peterson Co-founder of Agriculture Defense Coalition and former USDA Agriculture Crop Loss Adjustor, researched California State Department of Health Drinking Water data between 1984 and 2008. She has some compelling questions for our local and state officials: 1) “… Barium, Magnesium, Lead, Manganese, Aluminum, Iron, Sodium, and Specific Conductance (the ability of water to conduct a charge) were being found under unusual circumstances in our drinking water supplies. Unusual spikes were occurring in almost all drinking water sources in Mendocino County and in other counties throughout the State of California.” 2) “Prior to 1990, these spikes were not evident in many drinking water tests results (most tests results were -0-) … test results do show that in non-spike years these contaminants were not found in most water sources. Why?” 3) “And why are almost every single public drinking water source showing some form of this spike pattern? The California Air Resources Board Statewide Summary for Iron, Aluminum, Iron, Zinc, Manganese and Barium, also show positive air test results between 1989 and 2001. Our water test spikes appear to correlate strongly with California Air Quality test results. Why?” We believe there is enough evidence to warrant an immediate investigation. Our federal, state and county water and air quality officials have a legal and moral responsibility to locate the sources of these contaminants and protect the public welfare. Until more people start to care, begin to speak up and put the necessary pressure upon local and state officials, our children, our loved ones, our animals and eco-systems will continue to be exposed to dangerously high levels of aluminum and other toxic contaminants. We encourage everyone to do their own research and suggest the following links as a good place to start: http://www.californiaskywatch.com/; http://americanskywatch.com; http://www.sciencedaily.com/search/?keyword=geoengineering+and+drought Respectfully, Rose Taylor, Teacher Francis Mangels, Retired Forest Biologist Dane Wigington, Electrical Contractor, Solar Energy Specialist Dave Casebeer, Advertising Specialist, Concerned Citizen Rosalind Peterson, Agriculture Defense Coalition http://www.mtshastanews.com/opinions/x1950206316/Citizens-seeking-answers-to-aluminum-contamination-concerns [404] Article retrieved via wayback machine. |
| -Love will lead | |
![]() |
|
| epona | Aug 24 2013, 01:26 AM Post #9 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
o Easiest way to kill large populations o No bloodshed involved o No troops involved o Avoids mass panic reactions o No obvious proof of who is doing it o People can still work during their healthiest years o People get decline faster in older years, culling workforce and draw on pension profits o More $ to businesses depending on these illnesses for profits o It gets in everything....water, air, food crops, herb/health/organic crops, fish/chicken/beef/etc. o Easy profits for metal industries selling aluminum by-products for these uses |
![]() |
|
| yass | Aug 31 2013, 03:25 AM Post #10 |
|
'night owl'
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I could not have spelled it out better, epona.
|
| -Love will lead | |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2





![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)







