| Announcments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Welcome to The Hangout of Tranquility. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Your prehistoric animal theories | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 10 2012, 08:39 PM (442 Views) | |
| Guanlong | Mar 10 2012, 08:39 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Microraptor
|
I couldn't find a category for this. Here, if you want, you can post your theories about prehistoric animals, but, if you disagree with a theory, be polite, please. Well, here´s my theory: Ceratosaurus, could have crests like some lizards today, and even flesh extensions like birds, also, i think that females lacked horns, or at least had a diminute one, i based this theory on This image but anyways, this is speculative. |
![]() |
|
| The Dark Phoenix | Mar 11 2012, 06:24 PM Post #2 |
![]()
the avian phoenix emperor
|
i think that animals like plesiosaurs and pliosaurs might have used echolocation to find animals but i think they would have to be smart like a dolphin or a whale to do so or have a specific organ |
![]() |
|
| Guanlong | Mar 11 2012, 06:36 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Microraptor
|
I agree with you, except on the intelligence thing. Plesiosaur brains were small and i don't think they would be as intelligent as a whale or a dolphin, but anyways, it's your theory. |
![]() |
|
| Barrosasaurus | Mar 12 2012, 12:38 PM Post #4 |
|
Lavitaestupidaebella
|
my theory is that male T.Rex's and other tyranosaurs used there tiny arms as anchors when mating. sorry if it is gross but i think it is true. |
![]() |
|
| The Dark Phoenix | Mar 12 2012, 03:29 PM Post #5 |
![]()
the avian phoenix emperor
|
well there are many things with a small brain but if you think about it a predator needs to be smarter then what it is trying to catch |
![]() |
|
| Barrosasaurus | Mar 13 2012, 12:19 PM Post #6 |
|
Lavitaestupidaebella
|
... and when it is trying to catch fish, it needn't a very large brain. |
![]() |
|
| The Dark Phoenix | Mar 14 2012, 01:16 PM Post #7 |
![]()
the avian phoenix emperor
|
well it is logical that the predator is wiser then the prey a fox needs to know when and where to strike as for the hare all it needs to know is to run away |
![]() |
|
| Barrosasaurus | Mar 14 2012, 03:54 PM Post #8 |
|
Lavitaestupidaebella
|
that was my point, i didn't elaborate. |
![]() |
|
| The Dark Phoenix | Mar 14 2012, 05:55 PM Post #9 |
![]()
the avian phoenix emperor
|
oops i did not understand the way you posted sorry for doing that |
![]() |
|
| slg | Mar 14 2012, 09:17 PM Post #10 |
|
Egg
|
Does the size of the brain exactly determines the intelliegence of a species? |
![]() |
|
| Barrosasaurus | Mar 15 2012, 10:37 AM Post #11 |
|
Lavitaestupidaebella
|
yes and no. it affects your EQ, when being compared to other animals, but not your IQ. but it effects your maximum genetic intelligence. which no one can ever reach, same with animals. it is not your fault, i didnt make much sense anyway |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Sciences · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic | 6:32 PM Jul 10 |
Affiliates |
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy







