| Welcome to All Wrestling Talk. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| New No Mercy Match... | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 3 2007, 07:24 PM (915 Views) | |
| March Haire | Oct 3 2007, 07:24 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Jamie Lee Curtis
|
Squash. |
![]() |
|
| Don Carlos | Oct 3 2007, 07:28 PM Post #2 |
|
Slick Dick Dingo
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
New Champions~? |
![]() |
|
| March Haire | Oct 3 2007, 07:29 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Jamie Lee Curtis
|
Unfortunately, it looks that way. BOD V.2~ |
![]() |
|
| Don Carlos | Oct 3 2007, 07:31 PM Post #4 |
|
Slick Dick Dingo
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It had to happen eventually. And, hey, just look on the bright side (*sigh); at least we'll finally get another potentially awesome US title match at Cyber Sunday . . . |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Oct 3 2007, 07:45 PM Post #5 |
|
Deleted User
|
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that its not going to be a squash, but instead possibly awesome. |
|
|
| #LJB | Oct 3 2007, 07:52 PM Post #6 |
![]()
We The People
|
I don't see the Brothers of Destruction winning. Well, I do, but I don't see them winning the titles. MVP and Hardy will most likely lose the titles on SD! |
![]() |
|
| DarthHomer | Oct 3 2007, 11:12 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Fuckin' WWE...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm going to go with Emil on this one. This could be really good. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Oct 3 2007, 11:26 PM Post #8 |
|
Deleted User
|
That reminds me - has MVP defended his US title in the last 30 days? Doesnt that mean he forfeits it???? According to lame WWE 'regulations' of course.... :rolleyes: <_< |
|
|
| BoPearson | Oct 3 2007, 11:38 PM Post #9 |
![]()
RIP LeRoi Moore.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If you're a dual champion, that rule is thrown out the window. |
![]() |
|
| †SamuraiFoochs† | Oct 3 2007, 11:42 PM Post #10 |
|
The only tribute that matters...er, has wheels.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm guessing BOD win the titles, as Glen "Kane" Jacobs expressed supposed desire for one more BOD run before he retires. Also, thirding possibility of awesome. |
![]() |
|
| Chubbs | Oct 4 2007, 01:57 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Upper Midcarder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'd welcome this match had it had SOME sort of build up. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Oct 4 2007, 04:07 AM Post #12 |
|
Deleted User
|
...and stipulation? |
|
|
| DarthHomer | Oct 4 2007, 04:14 AM Post #13 |
![]()
Fuckin' WWE...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Doesn't need a stip. They're decent tag teams that they don't really need one... |
![]() |
|
| MutantLeprechaun | Oct 4 2007, 04:22 PM Post #14 |
|
Midcarder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So... who do you think will abandon the other in the middle of the match costing them the titles, Matt or MVP? |
![]() |
|
| King of Kings | Oct 4 2007, 04:57 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Politicker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm guessing MVP since he's the heel. Plus he already has the US title so the Tag title isn't that important to him. |
![]() |
|
| #LJB | Oct 4 2007, 06:07 PM Post #16 |
![]()
We The People
|
I'm guessing that the match will end in a no contest when a fight between teammates breaks out |
![]() |
|
| Teq | Oct 4 2007, 08:39 PM Post #17 |
![]()
Upper Midcarder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If they're planning to continue building Hardy and MVP as future stars, I don't see the need for Taker & Kane whatsoever to get the belts from them. Who the fuck would they defend against, the Major Bros, fucking great. MVP & Hardy should still be champs after the PPV, probably a no contest, dq or something. If they beat MVP and Hardy clean it was worthless, just totally, totally pointless. |
![]() |
|
| Joker | Oct 4 2007, 09:01 PM Post #18 |
![]()
Probable Date Rapist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't think this will be a squash, but I am with the general consensus that there should've been SOME sort of build up to this. However, I'm guessing that Undertaker and Kane will either reign with the title, or feud with each other again. |
![]() |
|
| jerseyboybastard | Oct 4 2007, 09:19 PM Post #19 |
![]()
Upper Midcarder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Actually, this match up does have some history, though no immediate buildup. Matt Hardy has a previous history with both Undertaker and Kane. MVP has a previous history with both Undertaker and Kane. Kane and Undertaker obviously have history. It'll be interesting to see what happens, but its addition is not worth paying $30 for. I'm hoping Taker and Kane will beat down MVP and when he tries to tag in Matt, he hops down and walks out on MVP amid cheers of the audience. One thing I don't understand, last Friday, Matt announced MVP was facing Kane and mentioned he got Kane to agree to the match. Well, why would Matt even be talking to Kane. I'd still be bitter about the whole Kane/Lita storyline back in the day. |
![]() |
|
| Cowards | Oct 4 2007, 09:32 PM Post #20 |
|
BOW BEFORE HIM
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nice how you can't understand why Matt is talking to Kane because of the whole 'Kane/Lita thing', but ignore why Kane is joining the Undertaker after Taker almost killed him when they were children. Love conquers all, I guess. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · WWE · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2









![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)








