| Welcome to All Wrestling Talk. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Where do you stand on the Wrestlescale?; A cookie to the first one who gets Russo | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 2 2007, 02:10 AM (977 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Aug 2 2007, 02:10 AM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
http://www.talkpw.com/wrestlescale/ Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: TNA 2002 |
|
|
| Billy Goat Gruff | Aug 2 2007, 02:12 AM Post #2 |
![]()
Midcarder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results![]() You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: ROH 2007 |
![]() |
|
| Andy | Aug 2 2007, 02:18 AM Post #3 |
![]()
Main Event~!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results![]() You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: ROH 2007 |
![]() |
|
| frighty | Aug 2 2007, 02:26 AM Post #4 |
|
Pimp of the Nation
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Suprised the hell out of me. |
![]() |
|
| March Haire | Aug 2 2007, 02:45 AM Post #5 |
![]()
Jamie Lee Curtis
|
I can't copy paste anything, but I scored a -7, and compare to Corney and ROH circa now. I thought about it, kinda surprised with the results, but as it turns out, I pretty much agree. I've always liked wrestling over angles. I chose WCW over WWE due to the awesomeness of their midcard, which featured great wrestling over hand birthing. Then when Russo took WCW to the shithouse, I again went with the company that promoted wrestling more...WWF. I stopped watching wrestling when the angles got too retarded (Katie Vick~!). I started again because I heard about this fantastic promotion called TNA...then decided that they fucking sucked and went to the mainstream fed that promoted wrestling I wanted to see...the WWE. I also tend to keep up with Japanese wrestling and American Indies a lot more than I thought I did, and have always identified with Corney. And I have an insatiable appetite for WCW Saturday Night. Hmmm... Pretty good results for ten questions. |
![]() |
|
| Mutant Couch | Aug 2 2007, 05:41 AM Post #6 |
|
Man-Bat Groupie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results![]() You are slightly traditional in your wrestling beliefs. You mildly accept the idea of sports-entertainment but believe that wrestling is still a sport and must have some legitimacy. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: WCW 1993 |
![]() |
|
| JimmyJackJericho | Aug 2 2007, 07:07 AM Post #7 |
![]()
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 |
![]() |
|
| coolcool | Aug 2 2007, 01:11 PM Post #8 |
|
A Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1998 |
![]() |
|
| White_Roach | Aug 2 2007, 04:15 PM Post #9 |
|
Upper Midcarder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new. Most similar booker: Eric Bischoff Most similar promotion: WWF 1996 This kinda suprises me, considering how much of an RoH fanboy I am. |
![]() |
|
| LAMB | Aug 2 2007, 05:27 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Roy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 Sweet. I suppose its gonny be this time for most of us. It was the time of superb wrestling coming back along with new and bolder storlylines. ECW at this time being the perfect example. Infact the 3 biggies are good examples of this during 96. |
![]() |
|
| Tietam_Brown | Aug 2 2007, 05:36 PM Post #11 |
|
Midcarder
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Same as Frighty, Jimmy, and Roy. Great minds really do think alike. |
![]() |
|
| DarthHomer | Aug 2 2007, 11:29 PM Post #12 |
![]()
Fuckin' WWE...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm similar to Nexty. |
![]() |
|
| pathollywood | Aug 2 2007, 11:54 PM Post #13 |
![]()
Unintentional Genius
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 |
![]() |
|
| Don Carlos | Aug 3 2007, 03:54 AM Post #14 |
|
Slick Dick Dingo
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't know if this is what you would consider a good score, nor am I certain that this describes me to an absolute tee, but, nonetheless: Wrestlescale - Results You are a moderate wrestling traditionalist. You reject the idea of sports-entertainment but you believe that charisma still has a part to play in character development. However you also know that wrestling ability must always take priority. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: ROH 2007 EDIT: Actually, come to think of it, this is spot-fucking-on with the way I feel. The Johnny Nitro's of the world are taking their collective toll, GOD DAMMIT, & someone needs to do something about it as soon as possible . . . |
![]() |
|
| President Skroob | Aug 3 2007, 04:01 AM Post #15 |
![]()
Messiah of Cool
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are central in your beliefs about wrestling. You accept the idea of both old-school and sports entertainment but you are not extreme in either way. You believe that angles and matches are equally important to create a good wrestling product. Most similar booker: Paul Heyman Most similar promotion: ECW 1996 That's pretty damn close. |
![]() |
|
| Cowards | Aug 3 2007, 11:25 AM Post #16 |
|
BOW BEFORE HIM
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results![]() You are a fierce believer and supporter in the idea of sports-entertainment. You cringe when you hear the words 'old-school' mentioned and strongly believe that angles and promos must take priority in the modern TV-based wrestling environment. Most similar booker: Vince Russo Most similar promotion: WCW 2000 Where's my cookie?! |
![]() |
|
| janedoe95 | Aug 3 2007, 11:51 AM Post #17 |
|
beotch pleez
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results![]() You are a fierce wrestling traditionalist. You cringe when you hear the words 'sports-entertainment' are mentioned and you mantain the fact that the wrestling matches are what sell tickets and keep the business going. Most similar booker: Jim Cornette Most similar promotion: MACW 70/80s omlulz |
![]() |
|
| Nathan Versus | Aug 3 2007, 11:56 AM Post #18 |
![]()
Versus > You
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Most similar booker: Vince McMahon Most similar promotion: WWF 2000 I own. |
![]() |
|
| Joker | Aug 3 2007, 03:30 PM Post #19 |
![]()
Probable Date Rapist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wrestlescale - Results You are slightly modern in your views about wrestling. You still have some traditional beliefs but you believe that the business must be more entertainment-based and must move away from the old and into the new. Most similar booker: Eric Bischoff Most similar promotion: WWF 1996 |
![]() |
|
| Don Carlos | Aug 3 2007, 03:49 PM Post #20 |
|
Slick Dick Dingo
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Indeed you do, sir Versus. What was your score on the scale? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Wrestling · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2








![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)














